Skip to main content

Twin Thrilling

The Mets are the team that made Johan Santana three years ago. Would getting a walk-off win in return for that be too much to ask?

Let me offer a better explanation and that requires flashing back to June 9, 2004, when Santana was just an ordinary pitcher. Yes, he was coming off a 12-3 campaign the year before, but he entered his start against the Mets having dropped four starts in a row, allowing 19 runs in 22 1/3 innings in that stretch. So ordinary seems an apt choice of word considering he was 2-4 with a 5.50 ERA.

I have a vague recollection of the game that night and the New York Times story barely acknowledges how good Santana was, because much of the focus was on the hangover from the day before, a 2-1 walk-off loss, and the game most people remember from this series was the next day's, a 15-inning defeat best recalled for Matt Lecroy's "mad dash" to score the tying run . Santana allowed one run in seven innings, struck out 10, and won 5-3. It's a sign of how much the Mets have been rebuilt that none of the players in that night's starting lineup are with this team today. Kaz Matsui struck out three times. Mike Cameron was quite upset about his two whiffs.

``I think this will be the beginning of something good,'' Santana told reporters after the game.

He was right. The biggest thing that came out of this game is that, all of a sudden, Johan Santana became an elite pitcher. Not just elite. Super-elite. This started a streak of 11 straight starts in which he allowed two runs or fewer. He lost only twice the rest of the season and in those games he allowed a total of four runs and five hits over 16 innings. Starting with that Mets game, Santana's record for the rest of the 2004 was 18-2. He went 16-7 in 2005 and 19-6 in 2006, with sub-three ERAs. Both seasons, of course, were "Mets-free."

Beginning from that Mets game, all the way through to today, Santana is 59-21 with a 2.55 ERA. That's as good as anything I've seen in my lifetime (purposely ignoring Roger Clemens since the man is a criminal and condones cheating).

So now Santana faces the Mets for the first time since that date and once again, he's struggling (if you can call 6-6 with losses in his last two decisions a struggle). Considering that the Mets helped him out a few seasons ago, there's hope amongst the Flushing faithful for a kind payback in return tonight. I'll say this: Tuesday's game will be a much better measuring stick as to whether the Mets have recovered from their own woes than Monday was.

True Mettanas know...Rafael Santana never had a walk-off hit for the Mets.

Comments

Unknown said…
As a Twins fan I can safely say that Minnesota's lack of run production with Johan Santana on the mound is unlikely to change tonight. Though truth be told, if that Nationals guy (I had to look it up, Levale Speigner) can shut down the Twins lineup, anyone can.

One thing in the Twins' favor -- Santana is a better hitter than someone Mets fans might be familiar with, our sometimes designated "hitter" Jason Tyner. Tyner can't even hit in Google -- you put in just his last name and he's not on the first page.
Anonymous said…
Clemens condones and cheats. Are the Mets any better re-signing Mota (and that's when the s**t hit the fan and the losing began--upon his 2-year return from HGH suspension).
metswalkoffs said…
Yes, the bad karma (and bad pitching) that have come from Mota's return have not gone unnoticed.

A fair point, except that Roger Clemens holds his own special position of hatred among those who should be frequenting this blog.

PS: Please sign your name next time. I allow anonymous posts, but I don't like them.
Anonymous said…
Not to be snarky, but if my handle was "Mets#1" one time and "CleonJonesRules" the next time an any more accurate measure of the zeitgeist? OK, I'll come up with a handle.
I utterly DESPISE Clemens for many reasons. But I love the Mets (save for Mota and a few others--and thanks for being on my wavelength with that, I'm tired of the Mota apologists), and they are breaking my heart.
metswalkoffs said…
You're not being snarky. I just like to know who my readers are. I usually, if I don't know them, shoot them an e-mail thanking them for commenting, whether I agree or not.

Thanks for commenting.

Popular posts from this blog

Mets Top 100 Home Runs: From No. 76 (Alex Ochoa) to No. 80 (Dom Smith)

In 2009, I did a project for my website, Mets Walk-Offs and Other Minutiae, celebrating the best home runs in Mets history. I selected the top 60 regular season home runs and the top 15 postseason home runs. The reason I picked 60 was because it represented the top 1% of home runs in Mets history (and 15 just felt right for postseason, giving us 75 overall).
This was fun to do, but it was imperfect. I had one egregious omission. I tended to favor oddities.
It’s time to give that project an update. And why not do it as a top 100?
The Mets have hit 7,671 regular season home runs. The top 80 represent about the top 1%. And the top 20 postseason home runs get us to an even 100 to celebrate.
Come along for the ride. Hopefully you’ll enjoy the reminiscing. 
Hopefully you’ll find it Amazin’.
80. Dominic Smith’s season-ending walk-off 
(Sept. 29, 2019 vs Braves) True story: I pulled into a parking spot right in front of my apartment as Dominic Smith came to bat. Rather than stay and listen to the ra…

Mets Top 100 Home Runs: From No. 16 (Carl Everett & Bernard Gilkey) to No. 20 (Tommie Agee)

In 2009, I did a project for my website, Mets Walk-Offs and Other Minutiae, celebrating the best home runs in Mets history. I selected the top 60 regular season home runs and the top 15 postseason home runs. The reason I picked 60 was because it represented the top 1% of home runs in Mets history (and 15 just felt right for postseason).
This was fun to do, but it was imperfect. I had one egregious omission. I tended to favor oddities.
It’s time to give that project an update. And why not do it as a top 100?
The Mets have hit 7,671 regular season home runs. The top 80 represent about the top 1%. And the top 20 postseason home runs get us to an even 100 to celebrate.
Come along for the ride. Hopefully you’ll enjoy the reminiscing. Hopefully you’ll find it Amazin’. 


The rest of the list can be found here.


20. Tommie Agee reaches new heights 
(April 10, 1969 vs Expos) Tommie Agee set the tone for a new beginning in the first week of the 1969 season. Agee had a dreadful 1968 that began in spring t…

Cliff Notes

Alright, so it's 2 days later and the challenge for me now, after reading through about a dozen game stories and listening to talk radio, is to provide a fresh perspective on walk-off #324. If you're going to be a serious reader of this blog, you know what happened already, so let's look at what made this particular walk-off stand out.

It would seem that the place to start is with the idea that everything broke just right on both sides of the ball. Particularly, I'm talking about Carlos Beltran's catch in the 7th inning, where he went over the center field fence to rob Jose Molina of a home run. Every no-hitter seems to have one defensive gem that makes it possible and perhaps that's true of great walk-off moments as well (We'll be looking into that!)

Marlon Anderson's home run required a remarkable combination of events. It was only the sixth inside-the-park home run at Shea Stadium by a Met and the first since Darryl Strawberry in 1989. It required that…