Skip to main content

Indian Givers

It's very hard to predict a World Series champion.

If you picked one at random each year, you'd have slightly better than a three percent chance of being right.

I've found from soliciting picks from friends and colleagues over the years, that if you actually think you know something at baseball, your chances are a little better. Unscientifically speaking, I'd put them at about five percent.

I bring this up because the baseball preview of Sports Illustrated has come out, and it picks the Mets to win the World Series. Lucky us.

I wanted to track Sports Illustrated's prediction history, because while I know it's not good, I can't put a number to it. Going through their archives proved to be a little more frustrating than I predicted (pardon the pun).

Some people seem to be a little nervous about the magazine picking the Mets. The roots of that go back a little ways.

In 1987, Sports Illustrated predicted that the Indians would be the best team in the American League. The cover proclaimed an "Indian Uprising!" and touted Joe Carter (good pick) and Cory Snyder (eh). The writers and editors were careful to hedge. The mag actually picked the Mets to win the World Series, an errant pick, though not an awful one, all things considered (guess they didn't know about Dwight Gooden's drug suspension...announced 22 years ago yesterday).

That same issue had a lengthy piece reliving Game 6 of the World Series, with commentary from most of the pertinent participants.

So it seems fair that we can call the pick of the 1987 Indians a Bucknerian blunder.

The 1987 Indians started 1-10. At that point in the season, they were 10 games out of first place. They failed to post a winning record against any team they played. They could hit a little bit, but they had a team ERA of 5.28 and their first basemen made 24 errors (note: that's not good). Their top winner had seven victories and their top reliever had eight saves. They weren't quite the 1962 Mets, but they were bad. They finished with a record of 61 wins and 101 losses.

But their is one way that I am hoping that the 2009 Mets emulate the 1987 Indians. The 1987 Indians had one positive skill in which they excelled in a matter better than all but one squad in Mets history. They had a flare for the dramatic.

For those of you who believe in jinxes, it may upset you to know that the Indians tied for the major league lead in walk-off wins that season. In fact, no Indians squad since has done any better. You know how many walk-off wins the 1987 Indians had?

Thirteen.

True Metdians know...Members of the 1987 Indians who played for the Mets at some point were: Brett Butler, Pat Tabler, Julio Franco, Jay Bell, Junior Noboa, Dave Gallagher, and Jeff Kaiser.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Walk-Offs in Movies, TV, and Other Places

Note: I'm leaving this post up through the end of the week, a) because I don't have time to pump out something new and b)because I was hoping to build a really good list of entertainment industry walk-offs...so if you're looking for something new, check back on Monday or so... Of course, if there's a major trade or move, I'll adjust and try to post something... In the meantime, click on the "Table of Contents" link as well. It has been updated. SPOILER ALERT: Read at your own risk Caught the ending of "A League of Their Own" on one of the movie channels the other day and it got me to thinking that it would be fun to compile a list of walk-offs from movies, television, and other forms of entertainment. Here's the start, and only the start, as I spent about 30 minutes or so thinking it over Help me fill in the blanks by filling out the comments section. "A League of Their Own"-- Racine beats Rockford for the All-American Girls

The 'Duca of Earl (and walk-offs)

If I told you that the Mets had just obtained a guy who is a career .316 hitter with runners in scoring position? How about if I told you that the Mets just traded for a hitter who has consistently ranked among the toughest in baseball to strike out? Or if I mentioned that the Mets just dealt for a player who was selected to the NL All-Star team the last three seasons, with the last honor coming via a vote by his peers? So, although he's on the down side age wise, his throwing arm isn't as good as it used to be, and he doesn't provide much power, there are a lot of good things that Paul Lo Duca brings to the New York Mets. For example: He'll sacrifice his body for the good of the team The Dodgers and Braves squared off on August 23, 2002 and Lo Duca made an impact both on the start and finish of this game. Three pitches after being dusted by Greg Maddux, Lo Duca made him pay with a first-inning home run. The Braves rallied to tie the game, 3-3 in the ninth, but thei

Minutiae Break: Worst Mets Relievers

It occurs to me after 79 straight walk-off related posts and some fatigue still remaining from Saturday's finish that I did promise to bring Metspective on other issues related to the Flushing 9, so I offer this posting up as a "Minutiae Break." This came about after several discussions related to the offhand Dick Tidrow/Danny Graves remark the other day , the conclusion of which indicated that it would be fun to create a list of the worst Mets relievers of all-time. I don't want to step on the territory of other bloggers, like " Faith and Fear in Flushing ," Mets Guy in Michigan " and " Metstradamus ," so I'll tread carefully here, aided by their influence. Should any friends, family members, or fans of these pitchers visit this site, I mean no harm. I'm just here to have a little fun with this topic. The ground rules are as follows: The pitcher must have had a Mets stint as long as Dick Tidrow's (11 games, 15 2/3 innings), for