Skip to main content

The Game After

The blog Tiger Tales recently studied whether or not a team has a higher success rate than normal in the game following a walk-off win.

He came to the conclusion that overall, there is not a significant statistical difference in performance in the following game.

So I went through my database and compiled how the Mets did in the game following a walk-off win, disqualifying games that marked the completion of a season or were ties (1 instance of a tie).

With Friday's win, the Mets improved to 182-169 in games that followed a walk-off win (including postseason). That's a win percentage of .519. Tiger Tales suggests that you compare that to the team's home win percentage, since in an overwhelming number of instances, your next game following a walk-off win is at home (not 100% sure of that, but seems like a reasonable premise). The Mets overall home win percentage, including postseason, is .514 by my computations.

So statistically speaking, it looks like there is no impact. I've had similar discussions with those in the sports statistics biz and they've come to the same conclusion.

But sometimes I think we're overgeneralizing by saying that. There are cases in which I think teams do play better post walk-off.

The 1969 Mets went 10-1 in games that followed a walk-off win. The statistically inclined might call that a small-sample sized fluke, but I think there's something to the idea that they played better post walk-off. Tom Seaver's "imperfect" game came the game after a huge walk-off win over the Cubs. The division-clinching shutout of the Cardinals came the game after a walk-off win. The World Series-clinching win over the Orioles came a game after a walk-off win.

The 1986 Mets went only 6-5 in games following a walk-off win, but their two biggest wins- the pennant clincher against the Astros and the World Series-clincher against the Red Sox- followed walk-off wins. As Sparky Anderson said on the CBS Radio broadcast, describing how he thought the Mets would fare in Game 7 of the World Series: "They'll come out looking like they're on stilts." That didn't exactly happen, but people in the ballpark that night tell me that they could feel it in the air that the Mets would not lose.

So I'll leave it to you to judge.

The day after a walk-off win, the Mets fan knows that...

The Mets are 4-2 in games that follow a walk-off win in 2008.

The 1975 Mets went a team-worst 0-6 in the game following a walk-off win.

The Mets have had two walk-off wins against the Tigers (both in 2004). One came in the game after a walk-off win.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The best Mets ejections I know

When you think of the Mets and famous ejections, I'm guessing you first think of the famous Bobby Valentine mustache game, when after Valentine got tossed, he returned to the dugout in disguise. You know it. You love it. I remember being amused when I asked Bobby V about it while we were working on Baseball Tonight, how he simply said "It worked. We won the game." (true) But the Bobby V mustache game of June 9, 1999 is one of many, many memorable Mets ejection stories. And now thanks to Retrosheet and the magic of Newspapers.com , we have a convenient means for being able to share them. Ever since Retrosheet's David Smith recently announced that the Retrosheet ejection database was posted online , I've been a kid in a candy store. I've organized the data and done some lookups of media coverage around the games that interested me post. Those newspaper accounts fill in a lot of blanks. Without further ado (and with more work to do), here are some of my findings ...

The 'Duca of Earl (and walk-offs)

If I told you that the Mets had just obtained a guy who is a career .316 hitter with runners in scoring position? How about if I told you that the Mets just traded for a hitter who has consistently ranked among the toughest in baseball to strike out? Or if I mentioned that the Mets just dealt for a player who was selected to the NL All-Star team the last three seasons, with the last honor coming via a vote by his peers? So, although he's on the down side age wise, his throwing arm isn't as good as it used to be, and he doesn't provide much power, there are a lot of good things that Paul Lo Duca brings to the New York Mets. For example: He'll sacrifice his body for the good of the team The Dodgers and Braves squared off on August 23, 2002 and Lo Duca made an impact both on the start and finish of this game. Three pitches after being dusted by Greg Maddux, Lo Duca made him pay with a first-inning home run. The Braves rallied to tie the game, 3-3 in the ninth, but their bu...

Been There, Won That

The Dodgers had 19 hits in their loss to the Mets on Thursday night in a game that, no offense (pardon the ironic pun), was excruciating to watch for many, many reasons, none of which I feel like getting into at this hour. Willie Randolph summed it up in his press conference afterwards, saying simply "It's not fun!" I wonder if Tom Hanks, Alyssa Milano, Ray Romano and Kareeem Abdul-Jabaar (all in attendance) stuck around for the finish? I do wish to note briefly, again with the aid of Baseball-Reference, that the last time the Dodgers had 19 hits and lost a game, it was to the Mets. The difference between that game and this one was that this contest, of May 24, 1973, lasted an interminable 19 innings., with the Mets winning, 7-3. Rusty Staub's fifth hit of the game drove in the go-ahead run. Ken Boswell added an RBI single and Ed Kranepool salted the game away with a two-run double. Some other noteworthy anecdotes from a quick box score gleaning: * Like Thursday's...