Skip to main content

I Feel So Innocent In This Whole Debacle

My friend Paul (the only person who will get the title of this posting) asked me the other day if I had any interest in going to see a Mets game this week in Washington D.C.

I politely declined. Monday, I was glad I did.

It's good to know that I'm not the cause of whatever is presently ailing the Mets, unlike in previous seasons.

I was at the Thursday/Friday losses in the final week of 2007
I was at Game 7 of the 2006 NLCS
I was at the Armando Benitez blown save against the Braves in late September, 2001
I was at Game 5 of the 2000 World Series
I was at the Rickey Henderson game-ending DP in Philadelphia the next-to-last weekend in 1999
I was at the Mike Scioscia home run game, Game 4 of the 1988 NLCS
I was at the recently mentioned Terry Pendleton HR game in 1987
I was at the Cesar Cedeno HR game in 1985
I was at the Banner Day doubleheader loss to the Cubs in 1984

But I'm proud to say that I was not at either of the giveaway games that took place at Shea this past weekend (I'm talking losses, not freebies). And while my overall attendance at Mets games this season has resulted in what I believe is a sub-.500 record, I know that I am not to blame for what is to happen.

(Editors Note: Not yet, anyway...sad fan that I am, I may go to a game in the Cubs series)

Instead, I blame the bad karma created by the Mets Shea Stadium sale.

I presume by now that you've seen the list of items that are being plucked from the walls of Shea Stadium. If you haven't, visit Loge13.com. He has the full list posted.

I can understand selling the foul pole and the lockers. Whatever financial institutions are left standing can put those on display in their corporate offices.

But I don't understand the selling of the championship flags, among other things. Couldn't they hoist those up in the new ballpark? Couldn't they display them in the Team Museum/Hall of Fame. Don't they need the three pitching rubbers they've put up for sale?

The Mets must be planning to give Pedro Martinez a two-year contract. Otherwise, why would they need the money that they may get from the sales of

- a used big-screen TV
- The signs from concession stands, the men's room doors, and emergency exits
- Mustard containers and napkin holders

I am all for collectibles and memorabilia and have a nice stash of neat and unusual items, which I've described in this space previously. But this is a situation in which the Mets are taking advantage of an industry known for its ridiculousness. At least with the seat sale, the money is going to charity. If there's any financial beneficiaries of this sale, other than the Wilpons, they might want to acknowledge that publicly. Maybe I've been asleep on this, but I'm not aware of it.

I'm someone with enough disposable income that I can spend a few hundred dollars on something without it causing too much worry, and I would have been willing to purchase something had the cost been more reasonable. But when you tell me it's going to cost $750 to get the sign that points to the section in which I have my Saturday ticket plan, that's absurd. And, oh by the way, I can only get that $750 sign if it survives those who pay $10,000 and up to be part of the Premier Club (I was offered an invite into someone's buying group, but won't be taking them up on it).

The Mets are 1-3 since they announced this sale, and their NL East lead has shrunk to 1/2 a game. They looked flatter on Monday than they have at any point all season. In fact, the best way to describe it: They looked like a team that just wasn't worth the money.

Comments

czaradio said…
When I saw the title of this post pop up in my RSS reader, I did a double-take. Completely freaked me out for a second. Viva Claire.

One point you failed to consider - I am 4-0 at games this year, and we have not attended a game together yet. Would my undefeatedness karma balance out your "debacle" of a record for this year?

Popular posts from this blog

Walk-Offs in Movies, TV, and Other Places

Note: I'm leaving this post up through the end of the week, a) because I don't have time to pump out something new and b)because I was hoping to build a really good list of entertainment industry walk-offs...so if you're looking for something new, check back on Monday or so... Of course, if there's a major trade or move, I'll adjust and try to post something... In the meantime, click on the "Table of Contents" link as well. It has been updated. SPOILER ALERT: Read at your own risk Caught the ending of "A League of Their Own" on one of the movie channels the other day and it got me to thinking that it would be fun to compile a list of walk-offs from movies, television, and other forms of entertainment. Here's the start, and only the start, as I spent about 30 minutes or so thinking it over Help me fill in the blanks by filling out the comments section. "A League of Their Own"-- Racine beats Rockford for the All-American Girls

The 'Duca of Earl (and walk-offs)

If I told you that the Mets had just obtained a guy who is a career .316 hitter with runners in scoring position? How about if I told you that the Mets just traded for a hitter who has consistently ranked among the toughest in baseball to strike out? Or if I mentioned that the Mets just dealt for a player who was selected to the NL All-Star team the last three seasons, with the last honor coming via a vote by his peers? So, although he's on the down side age wise, his throwing arm isn't as good as it used to be, and he doesn't provide much power, there are a lot of good things that Paul Lo Duca brings to the New York Mets. For example: He'll sacrifice his body for the good of the team The Dodgers and Braves squared off on August 23, 2002 and Lo Duca made an impact both on the start and finish of this game. Three pitches after being dusted by Greg Maddux, Lo Duca made him pay with a first-inning home run. The Braves rallied to tie the game, 3-3 in the ninth, but thei

Minutiae Break: Worst Mets Relievers

It occurs to me after 79 straight walk-off related posts and some fatigue still remaining from Saturday's finish that I did promise to bring Metspective on other issues related to the Flushing 9, so I offer this posting up as a "Minutiae Break." This came about after several discussions related to the offhand Dick Tidrow/Danny Graves remark the other day , the conclusion of which indicated that it would be fun to create a list of the worst Mets relievers of all-time. I don't want to step on the territory of other bloggers, like " Faith and Fear in Flushing ," Mets Guy in Michigan " and " Metstradamus ," so I'll tread carefully here, aided by their influence. Should any friends, family members, or fans of these pitchers visit this site, I mean no harm. I'm just here to have a little fun with this topic. The ground rules are as follows: The pitcher must have had a Mets stint as long as Dick Tidrow's (11 games, 15 2/3 innings), for